Four wallets buying the same token can be four independent people, or one person with four addresses. On a chart they look identical. FINNPUTER tells them apart, because it has been watching them for months.
Every tool on the market checks the token: is the contract clean, is liquidity locked, who holds the top ten. That data is sold by vendors, which is why everyone has it and why it separates nobody.
Almost nothing checks the wallets. Whether the buyers have a history, whether they paid for their position or were handed it, whether they have appeared inside bundles before. That needs your own record of what you saw and when, going back months, and it cannot be bought.
FINNPUTER has been scanning and storing since early 2026. That archive is the product. Here is exactly how it is read.
Early in tokens we watched run, and counted against every token they were early in, including the ones that died. A wallet that buys everything cannot look like one that picks well. Bundlers are capped and can never be recommended.
Wallets that keep buying the same tokens together are grouped and traced to shared funders. New groups are proposed every day from the latest runners, then tested only on tokens that appeared after they were fixed.
Sniper, flipper or holder, from where a wallet buys in line and how long it stays. A sniper is gone before any call goes out. The wallets that matter are the ones still in when it does.
When several rated wallets, unconnected except by our own rating, buy the same token inside the same window, that is the signal.
Only then does the safety engine run: clusters, snipers, fresh wallets, forwarded supply, holder concentration, liquidity.
Calls where our strongest wallets or groups are in carry 🔥 A. When a group whose tokens mostly died is early, the call is held back and never sent. Most tools publish everything and let you sort it out.
Market cap sealed at the moment of the call, peak tracked afterwards. Hits and misses in the same table.
One tap opens the bot with the trade already set up. Execution stays where your wallet lives. This site never touches a key.
Five places, five questions.
Several rated wallets, one token, one window. Full feed
Measured over every signal we sent, including the ones that went nowhere. A hit rate counted only over the winners is not a hit rate.
This site finds. No account, no cost, nothing to install.
The bot executes. Your wallet lives there. Buy buttons here hand you over with the trade set up, which is why nothing on this site can spend anything.
Trading never costs credits, only the trade fee. Credits pay for AI work, because that work costs real money to run.
Two ways to earn, and neither of them needs claiming.
Trading costs 0.8%. Credits are only for the AI, and cashback can pay for those too, so the research can end up costing nothing.
Two things, both already running. Neither is a promise about price.
The balance is read from your bot wallet, because a head start is a direct message and a wallet held elsewhere has no Telegram account attached to it. It is checked when the signal fires, not cached.
CORE is the front door, not the whole building. Everything below runs today.
Eight products, one wallet, one fee. The reason they are listed here rather than on the front is that breadth is not the argument. Every competitor has more chains. None of them can tell you who is buying.
It does not move your funds. No endpoint here signs or holds a key. Buy buttons hand you to the bot with the trade set up; nothing happens until you confirm there.
It does not predict. A score says a wallet was early. Whether that repeats is not something anyone knows.
It does not grade itself on hindsight. A wallet group found in past winners will look good on those same winners. That is why every group is frozen on a date and judged only on tokens that appeared afterwards.
It does not claim full coverage. Wallets that ran in tokens we never scanned are invisible here, and thin evidence is marked as thin. All the limits.